London, 22 September 1882 

Dear Mr Bernstein, 

Herewith preface, chapters I and II. No. III has also been com- 
pleted, as has a concluding note of some 7 pages on early German 
common ownership of land (“The Mark’). #78 But I want to revise it 
thoroughly once again and shall keep it here for a while. 

The puff at the beginning is something I cannot allow. Because 

@ Eleanor Marx and Helene Demuth-? Charles Lunguet-‘ Lilian Rosher 

Lafargue was the editor of the French edition and Malon sent in 
a highly inadequate affair, Marx wrote this introduction ?° with 
Lafargue, which may have been suitable on that occasion. In a Ger- 
man edition edited by myself, that sort of thing simply wouldn’t 
do. However, once Marx is back here I might at some time write 
a little pamphlet for you on the theme of German socialism from 1840 
to °52. 38” It’s got to be done some day. But Marx has got more than 
half the material, and God knows where he’s tucked it away. 

I would, of course, have to have doth drafts of the Accident Insur- 
ance Act, ditto all the new bills of a social nature submitted to the 
Reichstag in the autumn. 

The wholesale condemnation of indirect taxation had been mooted 
by us as far back as 1849 and °50, 38° and that’s where Lassalle got it 
from. I have noted the other things you say about Lassalle. Certain 
points are open to objection, but that’s neither here nor there. 
Lassalle as a person simply doesn’t come into it, but I cannot do other- 
wise than demolish the illusion that Lassalle was an original thinker 
in the economic (or indeed any other) field. 

I am glad to hear that the articles were written by Vollmar 3°; it 
shows how much he has come on. I quite agree with what you say 
about the Anti-Socialist Law. We shall benefit only if the law is pure- 
ment et simplement abrogated. And that will happen only if new life 
can somehow be injected into the German political puppet-show, and 
if something should happen immediately conducive to a revolution, 
a new era, *’’ Russian constitution or something of the sort. In which 
case there can be no doubt that we shall obtain majorities everywhere 
where there are now strong minorities and, besides Saxony, win over 
all the larger towns. 

As for the French, your plaint is the eternal one which everybody 
voices. They are governed by the moment, and by personalities. 
1 don’t read the Citoyen and do not get the Egalité at all regularly, nor 
do I know whether it still exists, so cannot have any real idea of what 
the chaps have been up to of Jate. But of one thing you may be sure — 
there can be no peace with Brousse. The latter is, and will remain, 
a consummate anarchist, his only concession being the admissibility 
of participating in elections; moreover he and Malon, by throwing the 
others out of the Fédération du Centre, ?°° have intensified the strug- 
gle in the conduct of which Brousse is employing wholly Bakuninist 

@ See this volume, pp. 324-25.-” purely and simply 

tactics——slander, lies and every imaginable dirty trick. The tactics 
the others employ may on occasion be silly and childish, may fail in 
their objective and make it impossible for us foreigners to intervene 
on their behalf (as, indeed, we have regularly refused to do), but the 
fact remains that it has become impossible, once and for all, to do 
anything whatever in concert with Brousse. He will not rest content 
until his clique, “Alliance’-fashion, has gained control of the entire 
movement. Come to that, the whole of the ‘workers’ party’, both fac- 
tions included, constitutes only a small and dwindling portion of the 
Parisian working-class masses. The latter still continue to follow men 
like Clemenceau, against whom Guesde has conducted his polemic in 
a way that is far too personal and also quite wrong in other respects. 
Besides, Clemenceau is perfectly capable of development and might, 
given the chance, go much further than at present, especially once he 
has realised that what is entailed is a class struggle; true, he won’t real- 
ise this until he has to. Now, Guesde has got it firmly into his head 
that Gambetta’s république athénienne* is far less of a threat to socialists 
than Clemenceau’s république spartiate,” and hence wishes to prevent 
the latter, as though we or any party in the world could prevent 
a country from passing through its historically necessary stages of 
development; nor has he stopped to think that it would be difficult 
to attain socialism in the France of a republic @ /a Gambetta without 
having first passed through a republic 4 la Clemenceau. But in the 
absence of such an insight into the necessary historical context of 
things and hence into the probable course of their development, 
party politics cannot be pursued with success. However, I have 
thrown up the sponge and am leaving the chaps to their own devices. 
Nor will the Belgians get anywhere with their admonitions. 

John Stuart Mill’s niece and adoptive daughter, who contributed 
to the election fund, is called Helen Taylor and is not therefore the 
same as Ellen M. Taylor. Although both these Christian names mean 
Helena, they are two quite distinct persons. 

I know absolutely nothing about Garcia. * From time to time some- 
one from the club comes to see me, and I shall ask about him when 
the occasion arises. 

Apropos. How did the rumour about Bebel’s death get into the 
Citoyen and the Bataille? It came as a tremendous shock to us over 

* Athenian republic- Spartan republic-°* See this volume, pp. 347-48. 

here-—as it did to Marx in Vevey, where he spent 3 weeks, ?7* and 
we had no means of verifying it until we got the Justice on Monday 
evening, containing a telegram with Liebknecht’s démenti; for 
the information, or lack of it, in the Sozialdemokrat could not reas- 
sure us completely because of its having been published on the 
Thursday.— By now Marx will probably be on his way back to 
Argenteuil, though he might spend a few days in Geneva. He is bet- 
ter but the poor summer has undone most of the good work effected 
by the cure. 

I would ask you to briefly acknowledge receipt of the ms., and also 
to send me the ms. with the proofs,—in a wrapper, of course. How 
long can I keep the remainder* here without causing inconvenience? 

Kindest regards, 

Yours, 
F. E.