I. In daily life:
Lax and undisciplined, careless about details, slovenly and not at all serious in life, not earnest, not abiding by discipline, not cherishing public property, disregarding the interests of the collective. When everyone is sleeping, he wants to sing; when everyone is getting up, he wants to sleep again. When everyone is in a meeting, he holds a small meeting. During class, he wants to be active; when it's time for activity, he wants to read a book. When happy, he is all giggles; when unhappy, he is lifeless. When his own feelings of nostalgia are triggered, he becomes sorrowful and distressed, even sentimental and tearful, the so-called "shedding tears at falling flowers, feeling sorrowful at the sight of the wind." In life, he cannot bear hardship, fears labor, fears setbacks, and replaces reality with fantasy.

II. In work:
Moods fluctuate between high and low. When speculating with interest-ism, he is full of enthusiasm; when negative, he is dejected. He aims too high and is unwilling to work hard and diligently. He likes to do leadership work, otherwise he thinks it is a waste of great talent, a hero unrecognized. He complains about every line of work he does, the grass is always greener on the other side. He cannot do big things, and is unwilling to do small things. Even when he does them, it is without a plan. When things are pressing—he is crude and careless, just going through the motions. He emphasizes the difficulties of the work and does not study how to overcome them; he emphasizes personal development and disregards the needs of the work.

III. In study:
He does not take study seriously. Even when he studies, it is just grabbing at things randomly, without a clue, starting with a tiger's head and ending with a snake's tail. His study does not proceed from reality; he is often satisfied with a smattering of knowledge, empty dogmas, and lacks a spirit of research. In terms of study content, he likes literary and artistic works, incorrect novels, but does not study theory and practical problems. He likes to spout grand principles.

IV. In writing and conversation:
Divorced from reality, he always likes to proceed from the subjective, without regard for the audience, talking grandiloquently to shock people, but in reality having nothing to say. In writing, he either doesn't write at all, or he writes voluminously, pleased with himself, the so-called "not crowing at all, but astonishing people with a single crow." In reality, it is impractical, moaning when not ill. He writes a few sentimental articles, like the wall newspapers in some schools, things like "Yearning on an Autumn Night" or "The Lovely Moon," even substituting his own feelings for the feelings of the masses.

V. In dealing with people:
When moods are compatible, there is nothing he won't talk about, the so-called "when drinking with a bosom friend, a thousand cups are too few." When personalities do not match, he is aloof and solitary, ignoring them, the so-called "when conversation is not congenial, half a sentence is too much." Towards others, he is suspicious and demanding; towards himself, he is tolerant without principle. He usually loves to pry into others' secrets to use as material for conversation with close friends. He loves to engage in idle chatter, a talker, a critic. He doesn't speak at the time, but speaks irresponsibly behind their backs. When others get into trouble, he rejoices in their misfortune; when others have merits, he is filled with jealousy.

VI. In relations between men and women:
On the question of relations between men and women, he speaks of it with great relish, not as a serious study and discussion, but to seek intellectual pleasure. When it comes to falling in love, it is not politics first, but emotion first, even holding a liberalist attitude.

VII. On the viewpoint of unity:
He values personal interests, is stubborn in his own opinions; personal interests are placed above the interests of the masses. If the leadership ability is strong, he obeys; otherwise, he looks down on it, grumbles, and creates splits. You have your way, I have my way, the so-called "scholars scorn each other." He acts freely, regardless of unity; whether permitted or not, he just goes his own way.

VIII. In political struggle:
He exaggerates the style of individual heroism, neglects the objective laws of the development of things. His fighting spirit is not strong, he does not adhere to principles and standpoints, and is prone to committing conciliationism, being either too "Left" or too Right.

IX. On the mass concept:
He likes to climb on the heads of the masses to issue orders, does not go deep among the masses. He has no clear love and hatred for the classes, just stands in the middle. He pities the laboring masses, and is indifferent towards landlords.