Criticism articles should not be as long as the Nine Commentaries. Each should be one or
two thousand words, never exceeding three thousand. Each article should have a central
theme, a single concept, clearly stated. If it's too long, no one will read it or remember it.
I agree. Unity and obedience are conditional, not unconditional.
The "three-in-one" approach should apply to the elderly, the middle-aged, and the young.
Don't look down on young people. People in their twenties and thirties can all do work. The
"three-in-one" approach should apply to the elderly, the middle-aged, and the young. The
elderly will all go to see God.
The situation is good this year, but we must still secure cloth and grain. Editorials should be
produced more quickly. Critical articles should be short. Peng, Luo, Lu, and Yang can be
labelled counter-revolutionary revisionists; everyone else can be labelled revisionists.
China's Khrushchev mentioned this in his article, and it should be mentioned in the title.
Major criticisms must be conducted with caution, with thorough investigation. Only with
thorough investigation can criticism be powerful; otherwise, it will be a fleeting experience.
When quoting Liu Shaoqi, we shouldn't just focus on the beginning and ignore the end.
Criticism must be well-founded. The term "trust" cannot be refuted in general; the main
focus should be on arguing for the claim that Liu Shaoqi is taking the capitalist road. Some
old terms should be given new meaning.
The "docile tool theory" should be criticized, but proletarian discipline must also be
maintained. Obedience and unity are conditional.
Writing articles requires careful consideration, accuracy, sharpness, and clarity.