. Chiang Kai-shek’s acceptance in Xi’an of the demands of Zhang and Yang—that Northwest Chinese people’s anti-Japanese forces be allowed to remain and that Nationalist troops withdraw from Shaanxi—marked the beginning of a shift away from his decade-long erroneous policies. This move dealt an initial blow to the schemes of Japan and China’s “pacification faction,” which had been plotting to use this incident to plunge the country into civil war, sow division, and even eliminate Chiang Kai-shek. The disappointment of both Japan and the Chinese “pacification faction” is already evident. Objectively speaking, Chiang’s expression of such awareness can indeed be regarded as one manifestation of the Kuomintang’s willingness to end its ten-year-old misguided course. Should subsequent developments proceed along the lines desired by the general populace, it would not only be a victory for the Chinese people but also a triumph for the global anti-aggression peace front.  Chiang Kai-shek’s statement on the 16th was vague and convoluted, constituting, in essence, an interesting piece of political rhetoric within the annals of Chinese politics. If Chiang truly intends to draw profound lessons from this incident and make genuine efforts to rejuvenate the Kuomintang—to break with its traditional policy of external compromise, internal military campaigns, and oppression of the people—he ought to have issued a forthright, forward-looking political declaration, openly acknowledging past mistakes and outlining a new path ahead, thereby demonstrating his sincerity. However, the statement of the 16th falls far short of meeting the expectations of the Chinese public, nor does it satisfy even the left wing of the Kuomintang. Within Chiang’s lengthy, over-one-thousand-character address, there is one passage worthy of praise: his assertion that “words must be kept, actions must bear fruit.” He noted that although he did not sign the conditions set forth by Zhang and Yang in Xi’an, he nonetheless pledged to adopt those provisions beneficial to the nation and the people, and that he would honor these commitments despite the lack of a formal signature. The Chinese nation traditionally places great value on trustworthiness; hence the saying “a single promise is worth a thousand pieces of gold.” Merchants often conduct business without written contracts, relying instead on mutual agreement. Foreign observers have heard of this, and they believe that Chiang’s actual implementation of his Xi’an pledges will further underscore the importance of integrity. Judging from his decision to withdraw troops, Chiang has indeed demonstrated a commitment to keeping his word. As for the other promises contained in those conditions—namely: (1) reorganizing the Kuomintang and the National Government by expelling pro-Japanese elements and incorporating anti-Japanese figures; (2) releasing patriotic leaders in Shanghai and all political prisoners, while guaranteeing civil liberties; (3) halting the policy of encircling and suppressing the Red Army and uniting with it to resist Japan; (4) convening a national conference comprising all parties, factions, military units, and social groups to determine a unified strategy for national salvation; (5) establishing cooperative relations with nations sympathetic to China’s resistance; and (6) adopting other specific measures—their realization first requires steadfast adherence to principles of trust and considerable courage. We shall observe Chiang’s future conduct to assess whether he will follow through.  Nevertheless, in his statement, Chiang also referred to the Xi’an Incident as having occurred under the “encirclement” of “reactionary forces.” Regrettably, he failed to specify exactly who these so-called “reactionaries” were or how he defined the term in his own lexicon. Yet it is undeniable that the outbreak of the Xi’an Incident was influenced by several key factors: (1) a surging tide of anti-Japanese sentiment among Zhang and Yang’s troops and the broader population of Northwest China; (2) a similar upsurge in Inner Mongolia and among patriotic circles nationwide; (3) the growing influence of leftist forces within the Kuomintang; (4) mounting calls across provinces for united resistance and national salvation; (5) the Communist Party’s advocacy of a united national front against Japan, based on the model of the Soviet Red Army; and (6) the expanding international peace movement. These were all real and undeniable realities. The “reactionary forces” Chiang mentioned likely encompassed these very currents. However, what others term “revolutionary forces” differs somewhat from his own interpretation. While Chiang once professed genuine anti-Japanese sentiments in Xi’an, he subsequently resumed attacking revolutionary elements, seemingly driven by personal animosity and a desire to consolidate his power. In fact, this reflects the machinations of the so-called “pacification faction”—Hu Zongnan, Zhang Qun, Wu Dingchang, Zhang Jia’ao, He Chengjun, Chen Shaokuan, and others—who sought to eliminate him. Accordingly, we would advise Chiang to revise his political vocabulary to more accurately reflect reality. It should be remembered that his safe departure from Shaanxi was made possible not only by the mediation of the Communist Party, alongside the initiative of Generals Zhang and Yang, but also by the latter’s leadership of the Xi’an Incident. Throughout the crisis, the Communists consistently advocated a peaceful resolution and undertook numerous efforts to that end, all grounded in a fundamental concern for the survival of the nation. Had civil war broken out and Chiang remained imprisoned, the outcome would have overwhelmingly favored Japan and the “pacification faction.” Therefore, beyond their solidarity with the Xi’an protagonists and their support for the proposed terms, the Communists have resolutely exposed the conspiratorial designs of Japan and China’s “pacification faction,” firmly advocating for a peaceful settlement. Generals Zhang and Yang, together with figures like Soong Ching-ling, whose views aligned closely with theirs, arrived at a remarkably convergent position: namely, that the entire nation opposes civil war and universally abhors it.  Having accepted the Xi’an conditions, Chiang has now regained his freedom. Moving forward, the critical question remains: Will he uphold his pledge to “keep his word and deliver results,” fully implementing all the terms of the national salvation agreement? The eyes of the entire nation are upon him, leaving no room for hesitation or half-measures. Japan’s aggression and the foothold secured by its collaborators within China must no longer be tolerated. If Chiang continues to vacillate on the issue of resisting Japan or delays fulfilling his promises, a powerful revolutionary wave will inevitably sweep him aside. As the saying goes, “A person without trustworthiness cannot be trusted.” Such is the predicament facing Chiang and his allies. Should Chiang succeed in eradicating the disgrace of a decade of flawed policies—abandoning his previous stance of yielding to foreign powers, resorting to internal military force, and oppressing the people—and promptly join a united, cross-party front dedicated to resisting Japan, taking concrete steps both militarily and politically to save the nation, the Communist Party stands ready to offer every form of support. As stated in the Communist Party’s letter to the Kuomintang dated August 15, they have already pledged comprehensive assistance to Chiang and to the Kuomintang as a whole. For fifteen years, the Chinese people have placed unwavering trust in the Communist Party’s words and deeds, more so than in any other domestic political organization. This is not merely a partisan declaration; it is a universal consensus. Militarily and in terms of military affairs…
The child gave it to ~jJ long ago ~

Therefore, this kind of
Granted to ~j Granted to ~

The principle of keeping one's word and delivering results J[ Keeping one's word,

Delivering results—a principle already widely recognized by the entire nation ~jJ The entire nation has long acknowledged this. The entire nation ~

The level is actually much higher ~ Parties are actually held in higher regard than trusting the words and deeds of any other party regarding Chiang Kai-shek’s speech on the 26th.