(.) Of the 10 People’s Commissariat commissions, relations are correct with one (? fuel).

What has this expressed itself in?

What real results have been achieved in the plan for the second half of 1921?

Fuel economy?

Conclusion: push ahead with the merger with the 10, overcome the inertia of the 9 that are doing nothing?
(.) Preparation of the plan for the second half of 1921?

People’s Commissariat of Agriculture (harvest?) Central Statistical Administration?

Current section
Supreme Council of National Economy

Something like this is how, in my opinion, the material for the report to the STO should be structured.

The general and consolidated plan will apparently not be ready before the autumn of 1921, and it cannot be given until the harvest has been approximately clarified.

Let that be so. (But harvest is one thing, while the quantity of tax realized and grain received is another. You will learn this quantity in 1922, post factum.)
So, we must proceed from conditional minimums anyway.

Partial plans have been drawn up (fuel?); half drawn up (People’s Commissariat of Railways?). Here, it seems, we can provide something factual.

One-fourth made? the number of mouths to feed? (this is the business of the Central Statistical Administration, not of Gosplan. Everyone will dump their work onto Gosplan. It must not allow this).

But the main thing still remains: immediately, at once, “piece by piece” to eliminate the obviously irrational, that which obviously contradicts the plan of state economy.
(close such-and-such establishments in such-and-such branch...
railways to be closed, half-closed such-and-such...
fuel branches to be built such-and-such...
the forest area which, according to Ramzin, will yield more than any Algemba, name it and give a plan: cut it in such a way, transport it in such a way...

Out of 1,000 good factories, start up 10 by such-and-such date, 50 by such-and-such, etc., at least up to 100 or up to 200).

Yours, Lenin