V. I.

Lenin

505

To:   G. Y. ZINOVIEV

Lecoin is no good at all. Can’t go in.

Broutchoux [3] is a stupid anarchist; he can only be published
with a note from the editors . (I shall write it in the proofs.)

Women’s movement (?)—send the MS. I’m afraid it will have to be held
over through lack of space.

I am sending imperialism and disarmament. [1]

Return the latter immediately . It must go into the Berne
collection without fail, as it will never be passed by the censor and is
very urgent (the Young and others have made an appalling muddle here).

If you want us to discuss the differences you point out, send me your
article again as quickly as possible and mark off exactly what you disagree
with.

The phrases about the “epoch” have become empty phrases—Radek and
others have shown this. Did the “epoch” of 1789–1871 exclude
non-national wars?

To talk about “defence of the fatherland” in general is
theoretically absurd. For defence of the fatherland =war in general . That’s the crux of the matter.

Junius [2] cannot be referred to Paris, as this article is inseparably linked
with both self-determination and disarmament.

Write what precisely is being set up.

P.S. I am sending Neue Zeit and The Call for Inessa .

Salut!
Lenin