EXTRACTS FROM DIFFERENT VARIANTS
I
I.
From corvée to capitalist rent.
Marx.
III. Size of capital investment in land.
II
“Summary and Conclusions”:
A)
Similar material.
Range of nuances.
B) “Seventheses.”
16. Summaryand
p. ù0:
conclusions
&quotations
III
Size of country and diversity.
Range of nuances, strands in evolution:
3.
α) Intensification due to vast industry.
4.
β) Extensive farming (livestock breeding—hundreds of dessiatines)
2. γ) Settlement
1. δ) Transition from feudalism to capitalism (slaveholding)
ε) comparative size of farms (?)
1.
Machinery
2.
Hired labour
3.
Displacement of small-scale by large-scale farming
4.
Minimisation of the displacement by acreage grouping.
5.
Growth of capitalism as farms become smaller (intensification).
(

MATERIAL ON THE CAPITALIST ECONOMY
6.
Expropriation of small farmers owners and tenants ownership of livestock
debts.
7.
Uniformity with industry (§ 15).
IV
10. Defects of conventional methods of economic inquiry.
11. Small and big farms by value of product.
11. More exact comparisons of small and large enterprises.
12. Different types of enterprises in agriculture.
13. How is the displacement of small-scale by large-scale
production in agriculture minimised?
V
4. Averagesizeoffarms.
“Declineofcapitalism” inthe South.
U . S . A . the South, the North
=
—
&
two divisions of the North, the West, the South
—
&
5. “Disintegration
o f capitalism” i n the North. New England & Middle Atlantic.
6. Capitalistcharacter.
6. Groupsbyfarmacreage. Overall result.
7. Idem. The South.
8. The North. New England & Middle Atlantic.
9. The West.
10. Thecapitalistcharacterofagriculture.
11. Groups by value (total value and value of machinery).
12. Groups by income.
13. Groups by speciality.
14. Comparison of the three groupings.
15. Expropriation.
16. Overallpicture.
VI
10. Shortcomings in the grouping of farms by acreage
11. Grouping by income
J
PMQ
PMQ