## 1

Not in other European programs.

Austrian social-democrats vs[76] P.S.D. and Ukrainska S. D.

Nothing "practical."

The completion of the bourgeois-democratic revolution in Russia.

The national question in Austria. (Indecision. Disintegration?)

London Congress 1896 and evasions ("dodges") of its resolutions.

Right to self-determination and Great Russian "population."

Right to self-determination and secession (interpretation).

Right to self-determination and divorce.

Education in an anti-national spirit.

Cadet-democrats and the right to self-determination.

National oppression in general and the right of secession…

3 bourgeois methods of solving the national question (1. Junker-serf; – 2. bourgeois-liberal; – 3. democratic).

Empty talk (who and how will self-determine? Constituent assembly? etc.).

The merit of P.S.D. minus the errors of R. Luxemburg.

The Program of the RSDLP in 1903 and self-determination.

Norway 1905 and R. Luxemburg vs "Naprzód."

The peasantry on the national question (K. Kautsky vs P. Luxemburg).

Nationalism of the bourgeoisie (oppressed nation) vs nationalism of the Black Hundreds.

The Ukrainian movement and the Ukrainian question.

Socialist-revolutionaries and their "unconditional" right to self-determination.

State secession vs strengthening of economic, cultural, and class ties.

Economic rapprochement and language as an economic factor. "National-state"…

R. Luxemburg & Co opportunists (Liebman + Yurkevich + Semkovskii).

Utopian Marx and practical R. Luxemburg.

(Ireland). Marx vs Lopatin.

Russia and "neighbors": Austria and Asiatic states (+ Balkans).

"With the possible exception of Finland" (Semkovskii).

General metaphysical phrases (R. Luxemburg).

The people – a concept of bourgeois ideology (R. Luxemburg).

Either "nothing"[77], or support all nationalist aspirations (R. Luxemburg).

Concrete, historical treatment of the question (R. Luxemburg)

"Majority of the people"? (R. Luxemburg).

Nationalist-reactionaries

« -liberals

« -democrats (Peshekhonov).

## 2

1. General metaphysical phrases?

2. "National-state."

3. Consistent democrats (vs liquidators).

4. London Congress 1896.

5. Nationalism of oppressed bourgeoisie and nationalism of dominant Black Hundreds.

6. Marx on Ireland.

7. Norway.

8. Opportunism of R. Luxemburg & Co!!

9. The national question in Russia 1905 and after[78].

10. Austria, Russia, Balkans, Asia.

11. Brazen knaves and intriguers: Liebman + Yurkevich + Semkovskii.

12. Unfinished bourgeois-democratic revolution and 3 methods of solving the national question (1. reactionary, 2. liberal, 3. democratic).

13. National oppression and self-determination. Cadet-democrats on self-determination.

## 3

I. A) The concept

juridical-terminological or historical-economic interpretation?

…secession; national-state…

II. B) National-state

= type, norm.

(R. Luxemburg vs predatory state).

Economic factor = language.

III. C) "Fusion with Russia"… vs Asiatic despotism situation in Germany.

IV. D) "Metaphysical phrase" people = concept of bourgeois ideology (R. Luxemburg).

V. E) Concrete and historical treatment of the question (R. Luxemburg).

VI. Z) Russia – bourgeois-democratic transformations are not completed (peasants?).

(National movement 1905 and after.)

VII. H) Russia and Austria (Ukrainian question)

(not in the program?).

VIII. Θ) Russia and Asia.

IX. Nothing or support of all national aspirations (R. Luxemburg) – "with the possible exception of Finland."

X. "Nothing practical"

(K. Kautsky and R. Luxemburg).

– educate Great Russian peasants and non-Russians in an anti-national spirit

Great Russian population

XI. National oppression and cadet-democrats on the question of the right to self-determination.

XII. 3 methods of solving the national question

XIII. Norway (R. Luxemburg and the fracti). The merit of P.S.D. – R. Luxemburg.

XIV. Right to self-determination and divorce.

XV. London resolution 1896 (sophisms of R. Luxemburg)

(socialist-revolutionaries and their "unconditional" right).

XVI. Program of 1903 – fiasco of P.S.D.

XVII. The audacity of opportunists. Rosa Luxemburg vs opportunists.

XVIII. Utopian Marx and "practical" R. Luxemburg (Ireland).

XIX. Summary.

(Opportunism of R. Luxemburg.)

## 4

§I. The concept of self-determination and the question of (I–II) the "national-state."

___

§II. (III–V) The arguments of R. Luxemburg and her treatment of the question.

___

§III. (VI–VIII) Has the bourgeois-democratic revolution in Russia been completed?

Concrete peculiarities of the national question in Russia.

___

§IV. (IX–X) "Anarchic phraseology."

"All or nothing" and "practicism" in the national question.

(The right to divorce (XIV).)

___

§V. Cadet-democrats and R. Luxemburg on the national question

XI (opportunists).

XII. 3 methods of solving the national question.

___

§VI. (XIII) Norway (R. Luxemburg vs the fracti).

___

§VII. London resolution 1896.

(XV) (R. Luxemburg and the socialist-revolutionaries.)

___

§VIII. Program of 1903.

___

§IX. (XVIII) Utopian Marx and practical R. Luxemburg.

___

X. Conclusion.

(XIX)

## 5

I. What is the self-determination of nations?

II. Concrete and historical treatment of the question.

III. Bourgeois-democratic transformation of Russia and peculiarities of the national question among us.

IV. "Practicism" in the national question.

V. Liberal bourgeoisie and opportunism of the social-democrats in the national question.

VI. The example of Norway.

VII. The decision of the London Congress of 1896.

VIII. The program of Russian Marxists of 1903.

IX. Utopian K. Marx and practical Rosa Luxemburg.

X. Conclusion.

(Summary.)

Written in February–March 1914.

First published in 1937 in Lenin Collection XXX.

Printed from the manuscript.