V. I.

Lenin

There is a Latin tag cui prodest ? meaning “who stands to gain?” When it is not immediately apparent which political or
social groups, forces or alignments advocate certain proposals, measures,
etc., one should always ask: “Who stands to gain?”

It is not important who directly advocates a particular
policy, since under the present noble system of capitalism any money-bag
can always “hire”, buy or enlist any number of lawyers, writers and even
parliamentary deputies, professors, parsons and the like to defend any
views. We live in an age of commerce, when the bourgeoisie have no scruples
about trading in honour or conscience. There are also simpletons who out of
stupidity or by force of habit defend views prevalent in certain bourgeois
circles.

Yes, indeed! In politics it is not so important who directly
advocates particular views. What is important is who stands to gain from these views, proposals, measures.

For instance, “Europe”, the states that call themselves
“civilised”, are now engaged in a mad armaments hurdle-race. In thousands
of ways, in thousands of newspapers, from thousands of pulpits, they shout
and clamour about patriotism, culture, native land, peace, and
progress—and all in order to justify new expenditures of tens and
hundreds of millions of rubles for all manner of weapons of
destruction—for guns, dreadnoughts, etc.

“ Ladies and gentlemen,” one feels like saying about all these phrases
mouthed by patriots, so-called. “Put no faith in phrase-mongering, it is
better to see who stands to gain !”

A short while ago the renowned British firm Armstrong, Whitworth &
Co. published its annual balance-sheet. The firm is engaged mainly in the manufacture of armaments of various kinds. A
profit was shown of £ 877,000, about 8 million rubles , and a
dividend of 12.5 per cent was declared! About 900,000 rubles were set
aside as reserve capital, and so on and so forth.

That’s where the millions and milliards squeezed out of the workers and
peasants for armaments go. Dividends of 12.5 per cent mean that capital is
doubled in 8 years. And this is in addition to all kinds of fees to
directors, etc. Arm strong in Britain, Krupp in Germany, Creusot in France,
Cockerill in Belgium—how many of them are there in all the
“civilised” countries? And the countless host of contractors?

These are the ones who stand to gain from the whipping up of
chauvinism, from the chatter about “patriotism” (cannon patriotism),
about the defence of culture (with weapons destructive of culture) and so forth!

---
Notes: