V. I.

Lenin

32

To:   MAXIM GORKY

Dear A. M., Now, sir, what’s the meaning of this bad behaviour of
yours? You’re overworked, tired, your nerves are out of
order. This is all wrong. In Capri of all places, and in the
winter when there are probably less “visitors”, you ought
to have a regular way of life. You have no one to look after you, is that why you have let yourself slide like this?
Honestly, it’s no good. Pull yourself together and give
yourself a stricter regime, really! Falling ill in limes like
these just isn’t allowed. Have you begun working at night?
Why, when I was in Capri, I was told that it was only with my coming that things had got out of hand, while
before me everyone went to bed at the right time. You must rest and establish a régime, without fail.

I will write to Troyanovsky and his wife about your wish to meet them. This would be a really good thing. They
are good people. We haven’t seen much of them at work yet,
but everything we have heard up to now speaks in their favour. They also have money. They might get into their
stride and do a great deal for the journal. Troyanovskaya
is going to Russia soon.

It is a great joy to me, and to all of us, that you are taking up Prosveshcheniye . I confess that I did have the thought!
now as soon as I write about our little journal, A. M. will
lose his enthusiasm. I repent, I repent of such thoughts.

Now it really will be splendid if little by little we draw
in fiction writers and set Prosveshcheniye going! Excellent!
The reader is new, proletarian; we shall make the journal
cheap; you will let in only democratic fiction, without moaning, without renegade stuff. We shall consolidate
the workers. And the workers now are fine. Our six deputies
in the Duma from the worker curia have now begun to work
outside the Duma so energetically that it is a joy to see.
This is where people will build up a real workers party!
We were never able to bring this off in the Third Duma.
Have you seen the letter in Luch (No. 24) from the four
deputies about their resignation? [1] A good letter, wasn’t it?

And have you seen in Pravda how mildly Alexinsky is writing, and so far not making a row? Wonderful! He sent
one “Manifesto” (why he entered Pravda ). They didn’t print it. And still, so far , he is not making a row.
Wonder–ful! But Bogdanov is making a row: a piece of exceptional stupidity in Pravda No. 24. No, we shall never gel
anywhere with him! I have read his Engineer Mannie . It’s
the same old Machism = idealism, so concealed that neither
the workers nor the stupid editors of Pravda understood
it. No, this Machist is as hopeless as Lunacharsky (thanks
for his article). If only Lunacharsky could be separated
from Bogdanov in aesthetics, as Alexinsky has begun to draw apart from him in politics ... if only...

As regards the theory of matter and its structure, I am
fully in agreement with you that one should write about it,
and that it is a good remedy against “the poison which the
shapeless Russian soul is sucking”. Only you are wrong to call this poison “metaphysics”. It ought to be called
idealism and agnosticism.

For the Machists call materialism metaphysics! And it so happens that a host of the most prominent present-day
physicists, on the occasion of the “wonders” of radium,
electrons, etc., are smuggling in the God business —both the
crudest and the most subtle—in the shape of philosophical
idealism.

As regards nationalism I am fully in agreement with you
that we ought to take this up more seriously. We have a
marvellous Georgian who has sat down to write a big article for Prosveshcheniye , for which he has collected all the
Austrian and other materials. [2] We shall go at this hard.
But that our resolutions (I am sending them in printed form)
“are formalities, bureaucracy”, there your abuse is off
target. No. It’s not a formality. In Russia and in the

Caucasus the Georgian + Armenian + Tartar + Russian
Social-Democrats have worked together , in a single
Social-Democratic organisation for more than ten years . This is not
a phrase, but the proletarian solution of the problem of
nationalities. The only solution. So it was in Riga too:
Russians + Letts + Lithuanians. Only the separatists —the
Bund—used to stand aloof. The same at Vilna.

There are two good Social-Democratic pamphlets on the nationalities problem: Strasser and Pannekoek. Would
you like me to send them to you? Will you find anyone to
translate them from the German for you?

No, the disgusting situation that exists in Austria won’t happen here. We won’t allow it! And there are more of
our Great Russians here. With the workers on our side we
won’t let in any of the “Austrian spirit”.

As regards
Pyatnitsky, [3] I am for prosecution. There is no need to stand on ceremony. Sentimentalism would
be unforgivable. Socialists are not at all against use of
the slate court. We are for making use of legality. Marx
and Bebel made use of the stale court even against their
socialist opponents. One must know how to do it, but it
must be done.

Pyatnitsky must be prosecuted, and no nonsense. If you hear reproaches against you for this—spit in the mugs of
those who make them. It is the hypocrites who will reproach
you. To give way to Pyatnitsky, to let him off for fear of
going to court, would be unforgivable .

Well, I have chattered more than enough. Write and tell me about your health.

Yours, Lenin

P.S. We know Foma -Piterets. He is now at Narym.
Foma from the Urals? We don’t seem to remember him.
At the Congress of 1907 there was a Foma-Piterets.