1. Why does N. Rozhkov's article in nos. 9–10 of *Nasha Zaria* deserve such a title and the most careful analysis? The possibility of examining the question of the two lines of the workers' movement and the "two parties" entirely apart from any "conflict" material, apart from "squabbles."

2. The type of "social-democrat of the days of freedom." Bourgeois democrats in Marxist dress. Rozhkov as a specimen; in his article, a complete substitution of Marxism with liberalism.

3. The role of the serf-owners in contemporary Russia from the point of view of liberals (Rozhkov) and Marxists. The "December Resolutions" (1908) of the RSDLP.

4. The relationship of democracy to the solution of the agrarian problem (Stolypin's) "by way of compromise between different groups of the bourgeoisie."

5. Is Russia destined for the "triumph of a very moderate bourgeois progressivism"?

6. Comparison of contemporary Russia and the Third Duma with France of the 1860s with the Legislative Body and with Prussia of the 1880s.

7. Have the "old slogans" turned into "dead words"?

8. Why is the "Society for the Defense of the Interests of the Working Class" founded by Rozhkov a society of liberal defense based on a liberally understood conception of the interests of the working class?

9. The proportion: Yu. Larin relates to the workers' congress as N. Rozhkov relates to the legal liquidationist party.

Written in November, before the 14th (27th), 1911.

Published in November 1911 in an announcement of the report issued by the circle of *Rabochaya Gazeta*

Reproduced from the text of the announcement