V. I.

Lenin

Russkaya Zhizn has raised a ridiculous outcry over the attitude of
Novy Luch towards the Social-Democratic Duma group. (The article
“Even Here!” in No. 45.)

It is ridiculous because Russkaya Zhizn chose to avoid the issue
instead of attempting to give at least some sort of pertinent answer to our
criticism of the group’s conduct.

We declared that our group should not under any circumstances have voted for
the Cadet candidate for the chairmanship.

We declared that, in its official capacity, our Duma group should not under any
circumstances have attended private meetings called by the Cadets and the Polish
Narodowci.

We declared, finally, that the Duma group’s conduct may lead to a split,
for it follows a line contrary to the spirit and the letter of the decisions of
the Party’s Stockholm Congress.

Lastly, we called upon the Bolshevik section of our Duma group to wage a most
ruthless struggle against the opportunism of the majority of the group, and to
hold steadfastly to the principles of revolutionary Social-Democracy in the
group.

We have written a great deal on this subject; we have published several
articles on the conduct of the Duma group in connection with the presidium,
examining the question from every angle.

Russkaya Zhizn raises no objection whatever to the actual issue
involved; it does not make a single serious attempt to defend the tactical line of the Mensheviks, who are actually in
control of the Duma group.

We were entitled to expect, and did expect, some at tempt on the part of
Russkaya Zhizn to show that its tactical line is in full harmony .with
the decisions of the Stockholm Congress of the R.S.D.L.P., that this line is
one that should bring about the hegemony of our Duma group over the entire Left
wing in the Duma.

But nothing of the sort has occurred. Instead of this we get a stream of sorry
talk, of ridiculous complaints that Novy Luch is badgering the
Social-Democratic Duma group, that Novy Luch is spurring the Bolsheviks
in the Duma group towards an immediate split.

Instead of an answer on the point at issue, we get the hypocritical exhortation:
“Novy Luch should speak more clearly. It should dot all its
i’s. And it should recall the counsel of the gospel: ’That thou doest, do
quickly.’"

Comrades! Your brashness is truly superb! Your out cries about a split
engineered by the Bolsheviks are the very acme of truth and sincerity.

The only organisation of our Party in which there is a split at
present—and a very bad split—is the St. Peters burg organisation. Who split this organisation? The Mensheviks split it, did
so against the will of the organised workers and to the gratification of the
Cadets, motivating their action by a Black-Hundred danger which proved
non-existent in St. Petersburg. And despite this fact, the Mensheviks stubbornly
refuse, to this very day, to restore the unity of the St. Petersburg
organisation—stubbornly persist in their efforts to deepen and widen the
split.

The Bolsheviks fought with might and main against election agreements with the
Cadets being regarded as permissible. But agreements were recognised as
permissible at the November Party Conference. At this conference the Bolsheviks
bound themselves to abide by the decisions of the local organisations; and in
every case where the local organisations deemed it necessary to enter into
election agreements with the Cadets, the Bolsheviks kept their promise, as a
“sacred and inviolable” duty to the Party. The Mensheviks undertook
the same obligation; but when they found that the organised workers of
St. Petersburg would not agree to follow them in the Cadet leading strings, they split the
organisation.

And now they wail about a split! As to the challenge presented to us by
Russkaya Zhizn , we can find no difficulty at all in answering it. We
have always dotted our i’s, and anyone who has eyes to see with can see the
dots.

The unity of the Party is most dear to us. But the purity of the principles of
revolutionary Social-Democracy is dearer still. We submit, as we have always
done, to the will of the majority at the Party’s Stockholm Congress. We
consider it imperative to carry out all its decisions. But we demand that these
decisions be carried out by the central, leading organs of the Party. And the
opportunist vacillations of the Mensheviks, all their attempts to propitiate
the Cadets by abandoning the line laid down by the Congress, have met, and will
always meet, with our merciless criticism and unyielding resistance. That is our
right and our duty. We shall never give up that right, never fail in that
duty. And if a split does take place, it will only show that the Mensheviks
themselves have trampled underfoot the decisions they themselves passed at the
Stockholm Congress. There cannot and will not be a split of any other kind. And
such a split can signify only one thing:

the final transformation of the Mensheviks into vassals of the Cadets.

“The scarlet banner of the proletariat has faltered in the hands of the
Social-Democratic Duma group,” we wrote two days ago.

The Cadets demand that this banner be dipped to them. The day when the
Mensheviks agree to this incredible infamy will be the day of the split; for on
that day the Mensheviks will cease to be a part of the Russian Social-Democratic
Labour Party.

---
Notes: