V. I.

Lenin

The insurrection at Sevastopol continues to spread. Things are coming
to a head. The sailors and soldiers who are fighting for freedom are removing
their officers. Complete order is being maintained. The government is unable to
repeat the dirty trick it played at Kronstadt, [1] it is unable to
engineer riots. The squadron has refused to put to sea and threatens to shell
the town if any attempt is made to suppress the insurgents. Command of the
Ochakov has been taken over by Lieutenant Schmidt (retired), who was
dismissed from the service for an “insolent” speech about defending,
arms in hand, the liberties promised by the Manifesto of October
17. [2]

According to a report in Rus , [3] the term fixed for the sailors’ surrender expires to day, the 15th.

We are thus on the eve of the decisive moment. The next few days—perhaps
hours—will show whether the insurgents will win a complete victory,
whether they will be defeated, or whether a bargain will be struck. In any case,
the Sevastopol events signify the complete collapse of the old slavish order in
the armed forces, the system which transformed soldiers into armed machines and
made them instruments for the suppression of the slightest striving after
freedom.

Gone for ever are the days when Russian troops could be sent abroad to suppress
a revolution—as happened in 1849. [4]

Today the armed forces have irretrievably turned away from the autocracy. They have not yet
become wholly revolutionary. The political consciousness of the soldiers and
sailors is still at a very low level. But the important thing is that it has
already awakened, that the soldiers have started a movement of their own , that the spirit of liberty has penetrated into the barracks everywhere. Military barracks in
Russia are as a rule worse than any prisons; nowhere is individuality so
crushed and oppressed as in the barracks; nowhere are torture, beating and
degradation of the human being so rife. And these barracks are becoming hotbeds
of revolution.

The Sevastopol events are neither isolated nor acci dental. Let us not speak of
former attempts at open insur rection in the Navy and in the Army. Let us
compare the sparks at St. Petersburg with the fire at Sevastopol. Let us recall
the soldiers’ demands which are now being formulated in various military units
at St. Petersburg (they appeared. in yesterday’s issue of our paper). What a
remarkable docu ment this list of demands is! How clearly it shows that the
sla.vish army is being transformed into a revolutionary army. And what power can
now prevent the spread of similar de mands throughout the Navy and throughout
the Army?

The soldiers stationed in St. Petersburg want better rations, better clothing,
better quarters, higher pay, a reduction in the term of service and shorter
daily drill. But more prominent among their demands are those which could be
presented only by the civic-minded soldier. They include the right to attend in
uniform at all meetings, “on an equal footing with all other
citizens”, the right to read all newspapers and keep them in the
barracks, freedom of conscience, equal rights for all nationalities, complete
abolition of all deference to rank outside the barracks, the abolition of
officers’ batmen, the abolition of courts martial, jurisdiction for the civil
courts over all military offences, the right to present complaints collectively,
the right to defend oneself against any attempt on the part of a superior to
strike a subordinate. Such are the principal demands of the soldiers in
St. Petersburg.

These demands show that a great part of the Army is already at one with the men
of Sevastopol who have risen for liberty.

These demands show that the hypocritical talk of the henchmen of the autocracy
about the neutrality of the arnied forces, about the need to keep the forces out
of politics, etc., cannot count on the slightest sympathy among the soldiers.

The armed forces cannot and should not be neutral. Not to drag them into
politics is the slogan of the hypocritical servants of the bourgeoisie and
of tsarism, who in fact have always dragged the forces into reactionary
politics, and turned Russian soldiers into henchmen of the Black
Hundreds, accomplices of the police. It is impossible to hold aloof from the
struggle the whole people is waging for liberty. Whoever shows
indifference to this struggle is supporting the outrages of the police
government, which promised liberty only to mock at it.

The demands of the soldier-citizens are the demands of Social-Democracy, of all
the revolutionary parties, of the class-conscious workers. By joining the ranks
of the supporters of liberty and siding with the people, the soldiers will
ensure victory for the cause of liberty and the satisfaction of their own
demands.

But in order to secure the really complete and lasting satisfaction of these
demands, it is necessary to take another little step forward. All the separate
wishes of the soldiers, worn out by the accursed convict life of the bar racks,
should be brought together into a single whole. And put together, these demands
will read: abolition of the standing army and introduction of the arming of the
whole people in its stead.

Everywhere, in all countries, the standing army is used not so much against the
external enemy as against the internal enemy. Everywhere the standing army has
become the weapon of reaction, the servant of capital in its struggle against
labour, the executioner of the people’s liberty. Let us not, therefore, stop
short at mere partial demands in our great liberating revolution. Let us tear
the evil up by the roots. Let us do away with the standing army altogether. Let
the army merge with the armed people, let the soldiers bring to the people their
military knowledge, let the barracks disappear to be replaced by free military
schools. No power on earth will dare to encroach upon free Russia, if the
bulwark of her liberty is an armed people which has destroyed the military caste,
which has made all soldiers citizens and all citizens capable of bearing arms,
soldiers.

The experience of Western Europe has shown how utterly reactionary the standing
army is. Military science has proved that a people’s militia is quite practicable, that it can rise to the
military tasks presented by a war both of defence and of attack. Let the
hypocritical or the sentimental bourgeoisie dream of disarmament. So long as
there are oppressed and exploited people in the world, we must strive, not for
disarmament, but for the arming of the whole people. It alone will fully
safeguard liberty. It alone will completely overthrow reaction. Only when this
change has been effected will the millions of toilers, and not a mere handful
of exploiters, enjoy real liberty.