To always impel the revolutionary democraticy, without merging with it, maintaining a critical] position, arming
against the reactionary democraticy.
Class party and class point of view does not mean tailism,— our class is an opposition] party — (Martynovism)
— definition of the tasks of revolutionary democraticy and hegemony in the sense of anticipating historical] contradictions of classes etc.
o.
759*
SAMPLE OF CONFUSION6).
ON THE QUESTION OF THE PROVISIONAL GOVERNMENT.
1. The reanimation of the revolutionary movement] advanced the question] was marked by a reanimation of the question of the provisional government (and participation in it by socialdemocracy). [On the agenda.]7)
2. It would seem not so close,— but the "danger" seemed so great to the tailists that Martynov dedicated a brochure to it8).
Clarity is needed on this question.
3. Martynov's thoughts and their vulgarity.
Analysis of "thoughts"
Silence in Iskra № 87.
Gapon is not answered re his
I "program" 4).
4. Taedium vitae 9) of Parvus: in leaflets, in Iskra, in the preface] to Trotsky10) he "rebels."
5. Precisely because he "rebels," he overdoes it 11).
6. Results.
Our organization = Viooo*
Even increased a hundredfold] — will not justify Martynov's reactionary fears. Program — classbased position.
Revolutionary dictatorship in a democratic] revo- lution. *)

*) This refers mainly to A. Martynov's pamphlet "Two Dictatorships." Published by the R.S.-D.R.P. Geneva 1905. The pamphlet met with particular approval from "Liberation" (AS 66 of February 25 (12), 1905) and from the editorial board of "Iskra" (A? 84 of January 31 (18), 1905).

RE. ART. SOC.-DEM. AND THE PROVISIONAL REVOLUTIONARY GOVERNMENT)) 121
2) This refers to a quote from Engels's pamphlet: "Der deutsche Bauernkrieg" Leipzig 1875 S. 120 ("The Peasant War in Germany") In the publication of the Institute of K. Marx and Fr. Engels. Giz 1926, pp. 111-112. Martynov points to this quote in the aforementioned pamphlet. See Lenin's Collected Works on this, vol. VII, p. 185.
3) "From the correct thought of Marx that we must prepare not a government party, but an opposition party of the future. Martynov concludes that we must create a tailist opposition to the present revolution." (Collected Works, vol. VII, p. 187).
4) In No. 7 of "Vpered," dated February 21 (8), 1905, and in No. 87 of "Iskra," dated February 23 (10), G. Gapon's "Open Letter to the Socialist Parties of Russia" was published. Gapon appealed for a combat agreement. Lenin responded to the "Open Letter" with the editorial of the 7th "Vpered" — "On a Combat Agreement for an Uprising." (Ibid., pp. 115-121). "Iskra," however, limited itself to an addendum to the "Open Letter" "From the Editors: "Our attitude to the issues raised in the letter is clarified in the editorial in the same issue." But the editorial — "Go Separately, Strike Together" does not devote a single word to the issue raised by Gapon.
5) The draft resolution for the III Congress was attached by Lenin at the end of the article "The Proletariat and the Peasantry." (Ibid., pp. 161-162.)
6) The feuilleton in No. 14 of "Vpered" begins with the question: "What is the source of Martynov's confusion?".
7) This refers to L. Martov's article "On the Agenda. The Workers' Party and "Seizure of Power" as our Immediate Task" in "Iskra" No. 93, dated March 30 (17), 1905.
8) See footnote 1.
9) Taedium vitae — weariness of life. (Collected Works, vol. VII, p. 192.)
10) Parvus's preface to Trotsky's pamphlet "Before January 9th." This preface was reprinted in Parvus's book "Russia and Revolution." (Published by N. Glagolev SP K. 1907) under the title: "What January 9th Gives Us."
11) This refers to Parvus's slogan "to be more revolutionary than everyone." (Ibid., p. 140.)