V. I.

Lenin

Wehave pointed out the unpardonable short-sightedness of the new-Iskrists’ view
that moderate Russian liberalism has been dealt its death-blow [1] and that the
vanguard role of the proletariat has been recognised by our democrats. On the
contrary, the bourgeois democrats are striving more than ever now to gain
control of the working-class movement; more harmful now than ever, therefore, is
Rabocheye Dyelo -ism, which the new-Iskrists are attempting to
revive. Here is an interesting leaflet which is being circulated in Russia and
which offers valuable material on this question:

“Thebourgeoisie has lately shown a tendency towards organisation; but what
is still more significant is that the bourgeois democrats are turning to the
workers. The democrats want to act as leaders of the proletariat’s economic and
political struggle. ’By conviction,’ they say, ’we are, strictly speaking,
Social-Democrats; but Social-Democracy, owing to Party dissensions, does not
grasp the importance of the present moment and has failed to lead the
working-class movement; this is where we want to step in.’ We learn
from what they have to say further that these new ’Social Democrats at heart’ have not worked out
any programme of their own but merely intend to explain things to the workers
and answer their inquiries. The literature is to meet the same needs and is by
no means to bear a Party character. And so these ’clean Social-Democrats’,
dissatisfied with the tactics and the present behaviour of the Committee, have
turned to the methods of ’lending ear to the masses’, which history has long ago rejected, to the methods of Economism of blessed
memory. Considering themselves to be Social-Democrats and the true spokesmen of
working-class aspirations, these gentlemen do not understand or do not want to
understand that the working-class movement will achieve substantial results only
if it is led by a united working-class party, if the proletariat is conscious of
its class distinctness and realises that its real emancipation lies in its own
hands and not in the hands of the bourgeois democrats, who are discrediting the
actions of the workers’ party. These ’strictly-speaking’ Social-Democrats,
alleged Marxists, ought to realise the demoralisation they are bringing among
the working-class masses by seeking to prove that certain ’democrats’ (but not
Social-Democrats) consisting exclusively of bourgeois intellectuals are called
upon to show the workers the way to freedom and socialism.

“Thelast point, though, they seem to have entirely forgotten in their
absorption with politics of the day. Little by little they are carrying elements
of opportunism into the working-class movement. The workers are not so keen now
on founding a party of their own, relying as they do on the
intelligentsia. Why, then, do these new friends of the working class
allow and even encourage such things to happen? The ’democrats’ themselves give a frank
reply to this question. ’Our group used to work only among the intellectuals,’
they say, ’but recent events have compelled us to turn to the workers.’ “Thedemocratic milk-skimmers, who call themselves Social-Democrats in
’principle’, began to give their gracious attention to the proletarian movement
only after the masses had come out into the streets and the blood of thou sands of workers had stained the pavements. Posing as the true friends of the working
class, they pass by with a hypocritical mien the work of decades, work which
has created and directed the revolutionary mood of the Russian proletariat and,
at the cost of great sacrifices, brought into being the united Social-Democratic
working-class party. Apparently, these modernistic Social-Democrats have
learned only one thing from the whole of Marxist doctrine (and that only
recently), namely, that only the power of the organised proletariat is capable
of overthrowing autocratic tyranny and winning political freedom, the benefit of which will be derived mainly by the
bourgeoisie. The new friends of the proletariat are trying to saddle
themselves upon the working-class movement and urge it on with the whip
of immediate results, to the shout, ’Onward, to our freedom!’ How apt the
Russian proverb, God save us from our friends, from our enemies we shall
save ourselves.”

---
Notes:
[1]
See p. 170 of this volume.— Ed .