V. I.

Lenin

58

To:   HIS SISTER ANNA

Anyuta,

Today I am sending to Mother’s address two notebooks of the “markets”. These are the first two chapters, about
a quarter or a fifth of the entire work. Altogether there are
eight chapters and I am now finishing work on the third,
so that by January it will most probably be finished because Nadya copies it quite quickly, as I write it. Although
I am abridging the first rough copy very considerably it is
still an enormous size. In the first two chapters I reckon
there are about 270,000 letters, and if you count 33,000
letters as a printer’s signature, there will be about eight
and a half signatures. The whole book, therefore, will be
about 35 or 40 signatures; I still hope to keep it down to
35, but even that will be a thick book (560 pages). It is
desirable to have it printed in a big format with average-sized
type, so that there will be about 2,400 letters to a page
and more than 33,000 letters to the signature—that will
be more convenient since there will be fewer pages.

As far as concerns the actual publication, apparently we shall have to place our hopes on finding a publisher. If
you happen to be in St. Petersburg, perhaps you will discuss
it with the écrivain . Would Mrs. M. Vodovozova undertake
to publish the book? [2] [I do not count on an independent
edition because I consider the collection of articles to be
a flop—although up to now I have not heard a single word about it or about the translation! If it should so happen that
this is not the case, our own edition will also be possible;
then it will be necessary to find a good, intelligent proof- reader, pay him properly and make it a condition for him
to send off every signature immediately it is read. ]

Printing can (and should) begin now (I say “should” because otherwise it will not be out by spring); it can then
be sent by chapters and I promise that I shall not be late.
If a publisher is found, a detailed contract must be concluded with him, and one absolutely definite condition must
be the despatch of proofs [it is very difficult for anyone
but the author to find misprints, for instance, in tables;
and then there may be corrections and addenda, etc.). In
spring the écrivain wrote to me that it could be printed
in serial form in Nauchnoye Obozreniye or some other journal.
Of course I am not against that, but it is hardly feasible
for any journal to take such a big thing—that would be very
unusual. It is far more likely that they would take a chapter
or two for publication. The second chapter, and the first as
well, are independent and complete. Having this in mind,
we hurried to send off those parts that were ready immediately. The only thing is, that if they are given to a journal
an agreement must be reached on the deadline for printing
them and also on the author’s right to publish the whole book
without waiting for the journal to complete publication. [3]

I am sending the Preface to the book, not for it to be printed (it will probably have to be revised or added to
after a time) [4] but in order to give an impression of the
plan of the book as a whole. I will send the summaries for
the table of contents with each chapter. If such detailed
summaries are not required (although in my opinion detailed
contents are more convenient for the reader), they may be
abridged and only the titles of the sections left. [1]

By the way, these section titles should not be set in bold-face type
or italics (that is too imposing) but should, on the contrary,
be set in the smallest available type. That would take up
less space and be more in accordance with the purpose of
the headings. As far as the tables are concerned, I also
think they would best be set in small type, so as to take
as little space as possible.

I feel that all these details may prove to be of no value— but for my part, at least, I want to do all I can. It is quite
possible that the écrivain will want, or will agree, to take
the matter into his own hands—the one pity is, however,
that he is unbelievably and incomprehensibly unpunctual
in maintaining communications and is, apparently, absolutely incorrigible in this respect. In general, he is rather too
lavish with his kindness; his wife, for instance, herself read
the proofs of the beginning of the collection of articles—
a tedious job that takes up a lot of time. Why should she
have undertaken it when she already has so much to do?
Under the circumstances it would have been much more convenient to hire (even if it has to be one they recommend)
a special proof-reader [5] and demand that he is punctual
in his work and informs you of the despatch of every signature of the proofs.

Here I have to stop. Please answer quickly, if only to acknowledge receipt of the manuscript.

Yours,

V. U.