V. I.

Lenin

Rabochaya Gazeta is disturbed about the political significance of the offensive. One of its
contributors even reproaches another, saying that the latter’s
evasive phrases ultimately amount to an admission that,
objectively, the Russian revolutionary army is now shedding its
blood for the annexationist plans of the Allied bourgeoisie
rather than for peace without annexations (Rabochaya Gazeta No. 93, page 2, column 1).

Now this “objective” significance of the offensive is bound to disturb the workers, some of whom are still
following the Mensheviks. And this is also reflected in the
columns of Rabochaya Gazeta. Not wishing to venture upon
an open break with the workers, the paper is trying to somehow
link the “offensive” with the revolutionary proletarian peace struggle. Unfortunately for the cunning
editors, the only connection that can be established here is a
negative one.

It would be difficult to imagine more pitiful and confused
people than these respectable editors frightened by those very
spirits which they, together with the Socialist-Revolutionaries,
have conjured up.

On the one hand, Rabochaya Gazeta reports that “the West now sees the significance of the Russian
offensive in an entirely false light. The British and French
bourgeois news papers regard it as a renunciation of the
Soviet’s ’utopian’ plans. Chauvinist resolutions are being
passed under the pretext of hailing Kerensky and the advancing
revolutionary army. And while the war drums thunder for the
Russian offensive, the persecution of those who hold the same
views as the Russian democrats and accept the same peace policy
is growing”.

A very valuable admission! All the more so because it comes from
a ministerial newspaper which only yesterday considered our forecasts of these inevitable
consequences of the offensive to be prompted by Bolshevik
malice. It turns out that the question is not of our “malice” at all, but of the fact that the policy
adopted by the leaders of the Soviet has its own logic and that this logic leads to the strengthening of the
anti-revolutionary forces in and outside Russia.

It is this unpleasant fact that Rabochaya Gazeta would like to gloss over somehow. The method suggested by the editors
is very simple: “It is urgently necessary that the Central
Executive Committee of the Congress of Soviets of Workers
and Soldiers’ Deputies, together with the Soviet of Peasants’
Deputies, should issue an explicit and categorical statement to
the effect that, as far as Russian democrats are concerned, the
aims of the war remain the same as before”, and so on, and
so forth. You see how resolutely the Mensheviks fight against
the imperialist war: they are willing to make another urgent and
categorical statement. The number of the most “urgent”, most “categorical”, and most
“impassioned” statements that have already been made! How many more times will it be necessary to repeat those
categorical statements as speedily as possible to moderate with
words, if only a little, the actions of a government which the ministerial Rabochaya Gazeta fully supports!

Really, gentlemen, your most “categorical” words, declarations and notes cannot alleviate the facts which you
yourselves report. Those facts can only be countered by
actions which would actually mark a break with the policy of continuing the imperialist
war. The government of
Lvov-Tereshchenko-Shingaryov-Kerensky-Tsereteli cannot do
that. All it can do is confirm, by its cowardly and pitiful policy towards
Finland and the Ukraine, its complete inability to carry out its
most “categorical” statements about “no annexations” and about the “right” to
self-determination. Under these circumstances, all those
promised declarations will serve as a means of lulling the
people. Lulling the people with high-sounding declarations
instead of waging a “proletarian peace struggle"—this is Rabochaya Gazeta’s programme,
this is its real answer to the growth of the anti-revolutionary
forces due to the offensive.

---
Notes: