PLANS FOR THE REPORT ON THE POLITICAL ACTIVITIES OF THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE*
Political Report
Not History, but Lessons   1) The Transition (1920 and Early 1921): From War to Peace.
1920–1921   IV. 1920: The Ninth Congress (Economic Reconstruction)
{
IV–IX: The Polish Campaign of 1920. 1
–XI: Wrangel. J
I (A) It was impossible to focus solely on economic policy and its foundations.
Lesson: Henceforth, greater emphasis must be placed on the fundamentals of economic policy.
?? : For most of the year, war prevailed.
2) A certain surplus emerged—and it was misused—(??) military forces—Warsaw (??) prodrazvyorstka: 235–80 = 155
155:6 = 2576

* See this volume, pp. 7–33. Ed.
** – Summa summaram – The ultimate sum. Ed.

MATERIALS FOR THE TENTH CONGRESS OF THE RCP(b)
(TU)
Fuel
The premature resumption of factory operations, coupled with a poor harvest, triggered a crisis in fodder supplies and equine strength.
3) The poor harvest exacerbated the crisis
the crisis of transitioning from war to peace—the crisis of properly accounting for economic relations—the crisis of the base: the weakening of the m(.
economic system.
4) The debate over trade unions, BI
The debates—or rather, the shift in the party’s line—distracted attention from the central task. {{IX–II}}
r Lesson: The elements of economic improvement were already present; they had simply been misused { and improperly allocated (not merely in terms of distribution, but in terms of the interplay among economic factors). In light of the poor harvest: we must do everything possible to alleviate the plight of the peasantry and strengthen the economic foundations of small-scale peasant farming.
The diversion of energy into trade union debates.
¦<
5) (The Trade Agreement with England ¦u< opened up opportunities for economic relations with Italy [.[concessions] and America. 6a The Kronstadt Events (February–March 1921). The political dimension and the political expression of economic malaise.
66 The political dimension of the matter and the political expression of economic disarray and imbalance.

Mensheviks, Socialist Revolutionaries, Anarchists. ?? A change of power (in Kronstadt, a new authority emerged). < Its futility. Its true meaning: a transition toward bourgeois restoration under the banner of “freedom.”
Politically, we had already fought—and nearly won—against this tendency; but economically, we needed to confront it without fear.
Tax instead of prodrazvyorstka ((not tax versus prodrazvyorstka)): adaptation to the economic conditions of the smallholder, freedom for local commerce, “reconciliation with the peasantry.”
The dual nature of this “reconciliation” (in the Kronstadt spirit?): a change of power? a change (?), a definitive articulation of the fundamental principles of economic policy.
Freedom for local economic exchange   Proletarian state power
a tribute paid for technical assistance forests, oil, ore, and more.
?? (1) + state capitalism (concessions) based on contractual relations (e.g., 1/4 vs. 3/4), the Decree on Concessions of November 23, 1920—purchase of coal (15 million gold rubles)
??
(2) + small-scale farming with freedom for local commerce
???
??
|contracts with him
(3) + the greatest energy in the struggle against bureaucratism
(4) workers’ democracy
2 economic bases
2 political superstructures
G against bureaucratism 1 [for workers’ democracy J

* – versus – against. Ed.