?? = general conclusions. Common knowledge. As something general, does not touch upon the question of revolution, on the forms and methods of withering away. Permits an opportunistic interpretation:
"withering away" versus "smash"
?? = general conclusions. Common knowledge. As something general, does not touch upon the question of revolution, on the forms and methods of withering away. Permits an opportunistic interpretation: II "withering away" versus "smash" II
Compare "withering away" and the quotation from *Anti-Dühring*
A panegyric of violent revolution.
Connect §§ 1-3, as "Class Society and the State" (p. 2).
p. 22 [192-194]
p. 22-23 [194-198]
Concrete development of the views of Marx and Engels: 4. 1847 (*The Poverty of Philosophy*)
and 1848 (*The Communist Manifesto*)
Forgotten passage: "the state, i.e., the proletariat organized as the ruling class"... How organized?
P. 4 [136-138]
P. 1-2 [128-132]
p. 27-28-29-30-31 [210-230]
5. 1852: Lessons of the French revolutions ("smash p. 2-3-?[134-136] the machine")... Engels on the "classicality" of the history of France:
х Experience of the Commune:
(?) 12. IV. 1871. (Marx's letter to Kugelmann.) (?) (30. V. ?)28. V. 1871. (*The Civil War*)
* In the manuscript it was originally written as follows: "Perhaps connect §§ 1-3, as 'General-theoretical views of Marxism on the state'?". Ed.
** See the present volume, p. 5. Ed.
312
V. I. LENIN
(?) Preface to the *Communist Manifesto* p. 1 [126-128] 24. VI. 1872.
P. 1 (B) [128]
(?) Bernstein on "doctrinaire democratism"
1872: *"Zur Wohnungsfrage"** p. 25 [204-206]:
"abolition of the state."
"the dictatorship of the proletariat": p. 26 [206]
p. 23-24-25-26 [200-208]
NB + 47 [302-304].

(?) Kautsky 1902 ("Social Revolution") and 1909 ("The Road to Power") very poor + Kautsky 1899 against Bernstein.
(?) Kautsky versus Pannekoek 1912 back.
(?) "Preparation of revolution."
p. ? pp. 11-12.) pp. 160-164
Quid est?* (cf. Engels 1894-1895,
(+ special sheet: Kautsky: "über Nacht")
Especially NB: "We appear more moderate than we are" (Kautsky), p. 44 [282].
pp. 43-44-45-[272-304] Revolutionary tradition.
"Messianism"? No, accounting for 1905-1917
"The Frenchman will begin,
the German will finish"
pp. 11-12 [164]...
(cf. Spectator 1915-
1916)... Or to chapter VII?
To ? in ch. VI.
Add: "the Frenchman will begin, the German will finish": Engels: June 2, 1894: pp. 11-12 [164].
(Ch. VI to ?). Engels on the peaceful path (preface 1895): p. 11 [162] (+??: pp. 27 [208-210]).
Chapter VII (12). Experience of 1905 and 1917.
Soviets. Quid est?
cf.
Bolsheviks
1905 and 1906, resolution
Same type as the Commune.
Chapter VII:
1. (a) 1905. Bolshevik resolution 1906. Nothing in West European litera-
* - What is this? Ed.
** See Works, 5th ed., vol. 12, pp. 231-232. Ed.

NB
Distorted by Socialist-Revolutionaries and Mensheviks.
Transition to socialism in NB concrete forms of transition (NB)...
ture on the state.
2. (?) 1915: Theses of "Social-Democrat".
3. (?) 1917. Experience.
- power.
- militia.
- transition to socialism.
4. (?) Attitude of Socialist-Revolutionaries and Mensheviks.
5. (?) My prediction in
June 1917 at the Congress of Soviets!
Chapter VIII (13). Conclusion.
Necessity of changing the program of Social-Democrats.
6. (?) Experience July and
August 1917.
7. September 1917.
8. "Messianism"?
Who will "begin"?

Ch. II. Concrete development of these views: experience of 1848-1852. Ch. III. Experience of the Paris Commune.
Whose Commune? of the anarchists and social-democrats.
Ch. IV. Economic bases of the transformation of the state into non-state (§ 6, 9-10). Ch. V. Engels's concluding judgments in the 1890s (§10 bis). Ch. VI. Oblivion and vulgarization of Marxism. Ch. VII. Experience of 1905 and 1917. Ch. VIII. Conclusion.

* This text was written by V. I. Lenin in blue pencil. Over it was written in ink the outline of the pamphlet. Ed.
318
V. I. LENIN