"There deployment will be 1 - 1 1/2 months" ...

... "we are entering the phase of socialist revolution".....

Strategy, diplomacy

and diplomacy are unnecessary, for the revolution has begun.

"The supreme council of the national economy will be needed even after the destruction of the state"....

[ ... "In the very crucible of the socialist revolution"....

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In a 10-5.

Knocks:

Years...

"bi-sex formula".... Who?

"metaphysics" is Lenin's. And as a trade

dog[ovo]r?

("our defeat will be a victory

of socialist revolution")

-------------------------------------------------------------------

[[ in the event of a transition of power to socialist[ial]chauvinists, oscillate between r[e]v[olu]cation, neutrality, and civil war ]]]

[ not war, but revolution we will proclaim]]

... "Demoralize the enemy by revealing their class position" ....

[ "International Field Revolution"]

"Field Civil War".... (bis)

The Soviet Republic (knows no armies)...

Bukharin:

"the state is a definite[ly] o[rganization]..."

Fond 2, op. 1, d. 5222, fol. 2, 5, 7 and 8 - autograph.

tear immediately

tighten?

acceptable?

to conclude, if renunciation of annex[es], or not?

against

I. (Lenin).

in favor of

for

for (+ Sokolniki!)

against

II. (B[ukharin])

in favor of

for

up

1 Stuk[ov], O[bolensky] vs.

III.

(O[bolensky])

vs.(+ Stuk[ov]) (-Sp[unde]) Obol[ensky] 02

Prot[iv] (Stuk[ov] Obolensky])

vs. Stuk[s] Obolensky]

vs.

IV.

(P[reobrazhensky!)

for

for

abstained]

Prin[ci]p[ial]nally allow peace with the imperialists] or not?

Shall we prepare a p[e]v[olu]-ts[ion] Red Army or not?

Do we delay until the armistice is broken?

If the Germans formally break the armistice, then make peace?

I. (Lenin)

for

for

for (+

Sokolniki!)

II.

(B[ucharin])

for

for

abstentions]: Lomov, Kosior, Bubnov, Krest[inskii], Spunde

III.

(O[bolensky])

Vs. (+

Knock[s])

Against O[bolensky]. (Stukov] 0) Sp[unde] abstained

against

IV. (P[reobrazhensky])

in favor of

for

against

cannot be printed

Are economic agreements with imperial rights permissible in principle?

Can't be printed

Is an annex[ionist] peace with Germany immediately admissible?

(Lenin)

for

for + Sok[olnikov]

(B[ucharin])

for

Against

(O[6olensky])

Obol[ensky] v. Stuk[s]

Pr[otev]

(P[reobrazhensky]

for

Against

Fond 2, op. 1, d. 5223 - autograph.

1* Further crossed out: "возд[ерялся]"; 1. Stukov - in favor. 2 - Abstained

2* Further Lenin crossed out the graph: "Will the war with imperialist Germany now be a civil war or a national war between a socialist republic and an imperialist state?".

1The meeting of the Central Committee of the RSDLP(b) with representatives of various currents in the party on the question of concluding a peace treaty with Germany was held on January 21 (February 3), 1918. It was attended by V.I.Lenin, I.V.Stalin, M.K.Muranov, Artem (F.A.Sergeev), G.Y.Sokolnikov, G.E.Zinoviev (making up 1 group); A.Lomov (G.I.Oppokov), N.N.Krestinsky, A.S.Bubnov, N.I.Bukharin, M.S.Uritsky (2nd group); N.Osinsky (V.V.Obolensky), I.N.Stukov (3rd group); E.A.Preobrazhensky, A.P.Spunde, Y.G.Fenigstein (4th group). The minutes of the meeting have not survived. Only the voting table of each participant on ten questions has been found: 1) Is peace between socialist and imperialist states permissible at all? ; 2) Is it permissible to sign the German annexationist peace now? ; 3) Should the negotiations be prolonged or not? ; 4) Should they be prolonged until they break with the Germans? ; 5) Should the negotiations be broken off immediately? ; 6) Is it permissible to sign the German annexationist peace if they break off the negotiations and the ultimatum?; 7) Is it necessary to sign peace in such a case?; 8) Is it necessary to sign peace if Kühlmann, under the pressure of the revolutionary movement inside Germany, agrees to the original conditions of our delegation?; 9) Is it necessary to create the Red Army?; 10) Are economic treaties between a socialist state and an imperialist state permissible? (see: Izvestiya TsK CPSU, 1989, 2, p. 183).

Compare also the published tables with the tables in the books: Protocols of the Central Committee of the RSDLP(b). August 1917 - February 1918. M., 1958, pp. 190-191; Lenin V.I. Soch, III ed., vol. XXII, p. 556.