9. E[ngels] on the "preparation" 
o[f] r[evolution].
R[evolutionary] t[ra]dition.
Ch[apter] VIII (13). Conclusion.
N[ecessity of] ch[ange] 
o[f] p[rogram of] s[ocial-]
d[emocrats].
[Steps toward this in S[ocia-
list] 
L a b o u r 
P[arty] *] — 
down with it!
Draft 
p[ro]g[ram] 
o[f] R. S.-D. R. P. 
in 
IV 
and 
V.
1917.

NOTES ON THE PLAN OF THE PAMPHLET.

Should one not add a chapter (or §§ to Chapter VII): concretization of the tasks of the proletarian revolution through the experience of the Russian revolution of 1917? This is necessary!

Develop Ch[apter] VII, in II

One must add: the r e l a t i o n s h i p   t o   a n a r c h i s m.

"Whose" Commune? When, how and in what respect is the s[tate] not needed?

This can be included in a commentary to Engels' article against an[archists] of 1873.

On the question of "messianism": "Was ökonomisch formal falsch, kann weltgeschichtlich richtig sein," preface by E[ngels] to "The H[oly] F[amily]," Russian transl[ation] by S. Alekseyev, 3rd ed[ition], "New World," St. Petersburg 1906, pp. 7—8: "However, what is f o r m a l l y false from the standpoint of economic science may be entirely correct from the standpoint of world history."

..."In a formal economic error there may be concealed quite real economic c o n t e n t" (p. 8).

* Socialist W o r k e r s   P a r t y [of America. Editor]