We find ourselves in a difficult position. We have three resolutions and three amendments. The resolutions are growing and developing, and this process is entirely unregulated. The theme has proven broader than the rapporteur anticipated. We will have to return the resolution to the commission, although comrade Sergeev apparently ridicules this proposal. All the speakers touched upon the question of open action. The report corresponds to the theme, but it requires supplementation. Regarding participation in societies, two opinions have clashed. The congress cannot give categorical directives about participation in societies. One must use all means for agitation. From experience with the Shidlovskii Commission one cannot draw an absolutely negative conclusion{55}. They say the resolution gives nothing new. Good—say it, and say it again. Comrade Zimina's opinion is angular. One cannot answer categorically whether one should participate in the zemstvo sobor. Everything will depend on the political conjuncture, the system of elections, and other concrete conditions which cannot be foreseen in advance. They say the zemstvo sobor is a deception. This is true, but sometimes in order to expose the deception, one must take part in the elections. Nothing can be given besides a general directive. I repeat, in my view, all the resolutions should be returned to the commission, with its composition expanded.