Egorov: I) Incident with the CC 1) requests a break: 36;

2) requests closing remarks: 40; 3) accuses Pavlovich 42–43. – II) Speech against the Bund: 93. – III) Significance of recognizing *Iskra* as an organ: 138, 140. – IV) for one center, for a popular organ, for defining the bounds of CC competence: 155. – V) closure of the speakers' list is a formal violation: 159 (for the Bund){174}. – VI) hisses at Plekhanov: 169–170. – VII) for equal rights of languages: 172, 174, 181 ("to bring the Congress around"){175}. — VIII) Agrarian program unclear 192 (theoretically convinced: 197). "Far from enthusiasm for the editorial board's [emphasis on] peasant movement": 205. – IX) Unclear in § 1: 238 (sole speech on § 1). – X) Party Council unclear: 267 and 269 (middle position){176}. – XI) limitation of CC authority: 272, 273. – XII) "suppression" of *Rabochee Delo* and departure from the hall{177}, 283–284. — XIII) demand for a vote on the *Yuzhny Rabochiy* 312, 313, 314 ("lie" that *Yuzhny Rabochiy* = *Rabochaya Mysl'*, cf. 356 (against Bonch). – XIV) principles lost (around personalities): 337. — XV) support for the opposition. Unclear, 359.{178}

Makhov: I) Against the question of the Bund in first place: 32–33 ("sore question": democratism or centralism NB). – II) for the CC in the incident: 46. — III) for equal rights of languages ter: 172–173. — IV) agrarian program "not social-democratic" 201, demagoguery, 202; peasantry into classes – 202, id.{194} 216. Against the entire agrarian program: 211. + Liber. 212 (NB 211 and others: a great muddler{182}). – V) revolution like a riot, 206 (laughter). – VI) against support for the revolutionary movement (laughter) – 226. Contra{195}: 229 (and the bourgeoisie is revolutionary)!! – VII) § 1 bis{196} with Martov. – VIII) Abstains from voting on the Bund. Would vote for § 2: p. 289–290 (Muddler!!){183}. – IX) for *Svoboda*{184}: 307. —X) "improper" – for the editorial board 323, id. 328,{185}

Lvov: I) Against the Bund: 33, 78 and 89 (good speeches). – II) for equal rights of languages ter. 172. — III) on § 1 bis for Martov – 254. – IV) for *Svoboda* – 307 and 319.

Tsarev: I) for one center: 263. – II) for equal rights of languages (2 abstained and 1 time for Martynov) – 172. – III) on § 1 bis for me. – IV) for the editorial board 324 (vulgarity NB). – V) election of 1 editor: 335.{186}

Belov: I) equal rights of languages (1 time for and 2 against us). – II) § 1 bis for Martov. – III) for the *Yuzhny Rabochiy* 308. — IV) for the six-person [board]: 335.

Pavlovich:

1) Against the "*Borba*" 39

2) incident with the CC. 41, 43, 45

3) equal rights of languages – for us

4) § 1 – 247 – for me (good speech 247)

cf. 255 – irony

5) for preponderance of CO over CC – 264

6) for the three-person [board] – 328.

Sorokin:

1) Against the "*Borba*" – 39

2) equal rights of languages for us (ter)

3) § 1 for me (bis)

4) against the six-person [board] – NB – 328

5) idem "on Lenin's evil intent"{187} – 339

C) – on Deich's words p. 351.

Lyadov:

1) Against the Bund (briefly) – 70, 120

2) for the *Iskra* – 140

3) equal rights of languages + + +

4) strike out "poor children"{188} – 180

5) substantive amendments to the agrarian program – 188

(a passim{197})

6) § 1+ +

7) against the *Yuzhny Rabochiy* (good) – 316

8)     »       six-person [board] – 326.

Gorin:

1) Reply to Martynov – 119 (cf. 121 and 166){189}

2) for *Iskra* – 137 and 141

3) agrarian program, amendments – 191, 196, 212

4) equal rights of languages + + +

5) § 1 + +

6) against the *Yuzhny Rabochiy* – 317

7)   »        six-person [board] —325.

Glebov:

1) influence of CC from activity…{190} 158

2) for dissolution of the *Yuzhny Rabochiy* – 316

3) against the six-person [board] – 328.

Lensky:

1) Against the Voronezh Committee 50

2) equal rights of languages against us 172, 173

(2 out of 3)

3) § 1 – against me bis.

Stepanov:

1) 77 – against the Bund – 77

2) equal rights of languages: abstained + bis for us

3) § 1 —for me bis.

Gorsky:

1) equal rights of languages – , 0, + (+ for us)

2) § 1 + and + bis (for me).

Karsky:

1) remark (minor) against the CC – 55

2) against the Bund 65, 81, 89

NB

3) reply to Martynov and on the party – 126{191}

4) equal rights of languages – – —

5) for the agrarian program 207, 213, 222

6) § 1 speech 239 (—). – —

Rusoe:

1) against Bundism 65 and 71, 104

2) equal rights of languages – – —

3) agrarian program substantive amendment – 225

4) § 1 – speech 247

5) Soviet. For me – 265

6) on new Bundism 296, 302{192}

7) against the *Yuzhny Rabochiy* 314

8) against the six-person [board] 325.

Bekov:

1) against the Bund – 81

2) equal rights of languages – – —

3) § 1 + +

Lange:

1) against the "*Borba*": 38

2)    »      the Bund: 69

3) agrarian [program]. Cutoff provisions unclear. Why not expropriate all land? || NB

Not enchanted with the agrarian program – 205.

Proposes changes in editing: 225

4) equal rights of languages ter for us

5) § 1 bis for me

6) on the Soviet against me (265) – || NB

7) against the *Yuzhny Rabochiy* – 315 —

good – NB

8) »       six-person [board] – 327. – NB.

Gusev:

1) equal rights of languages ter for us

2) speech on the agrarian program very substantive – 203

3) § 1 for me

4) impossible to protect the CC from CO influence – 265

5) against the *Yuzhny Rabochiy* – 312 and 314 (NB)

6) speech against the six-person [board] – 326.

Muravyev:

1) against the Bund – p. 76

2) for *Iskra* – 139 and 141

3) equal rights of languages – ter for us

4) for the agrarian program (trifles) – 216 and 217

5) for § 1 (248) and bis

6) against the *Yuzhny Rabochiy* – 313 and 315

7)    »      six-person [board] – 321 (meaning: 353 NB).