that is, that the world does not satisfy man, and man through his action decides to change it.

... "This determinateness contained in the concept, equal to it and encompassing within itself the requirement of singular external actuality, is the Good. It comes forward with the dignity of something absolute, inasmuch as it is the totality of the concept within itself, the objective, which at the same time possesses the form of free unity and subjectivity. This idea is higher than the idea of the previously considered cognition, because the first has the dignity not only of the universal, but simply of the actual"... (320-321) [290].

**The essence:**

The "Good" is a "requirement of external actuality," that is, by "good" is understood human practice = requirement (1) and external actuality (2).

Practice stands higher than (theoretical) cognition, inasmuch as it possesses not only the dignity of universality, but also of immediate actuality.

... "The activity of the end is therefore directed not at itself for taking within itself and assimilating to itself some given determinateness, but rather is directed toward positing its own determinateness and giving itself reality in the form of external actuality through the sublation of the determinations of the external world"... (321) [290]...

...

"The activity of the end is directed not at itself...

but at giving itself reality in the form of external actuality through the annihilation of specific (aspects, features, phenomena) of the external world"...

196

V. I. LENIN

..."Accomplished good is good by virtue of the fact that it already exists in the subjective end, in its idea; accomplishment gives it a certain external existence"... (322) [291].

"From the side of the objective world presupposed to it, in the presupposition of which consists the subjectivity and finitude of good and which, as something other, goes its own way, the very accomplishment of good is subject to obstacles and even encounters impossibility"... + (322-323) [292].

The "objective world" "goes its own way," and human practice, having before it this objective world, encounters "difficulties in the realization" of the end, even comes up against "impossibility"...

+ ... "Good thus remains a certain Ought; it is in-itself and for-itself, but being as the last, abstract immediacy remains in opposition to good, also determined as a certain non-being"... + +

Good, benefit, benevolent strivings remain SUBJECTIVE OUGHT...

+ + ..."The idea of accomplished good is, it is true, a certain absolute postulate, but nothing more than a postulate, that is, the absolute burdened with the determinateness of subjectivity. Here there are still two opposed worlds, the kingdom of subjectivity in the pure spaces of transparent thought and the kingdom of objectivity in the element of a certain external manifold actuality, which is an unrevealed kingdom of darkness. The complete development of the unresolved contradiction formed by the indicated absolute end, to which there implacably stands opposed

**Two worlds:**
**subjective and objective**

197