And p. 358 [298-299]: the so-called justified contempt for natural philosophy was provoked by the trivial play of empty analogies.
In ordinary logic* formalism separates thinking from objectivity:
"Thinking is recognized here as merely a purely subjective and formal activity, while the objective, in opposition to thinking, is considered something stable and given in itself. But this dualism is not true, and it is senseless to take the determinations of subjectivity and objectivity so simply, without asking about their origin"...
(359-360) [300]. In reality, subjectivity is only a stage of development from Being and Essence, - and then this subjectivity "dialectically 'breaks through its own limit'" and "through the syllogism unfolds into objectivity" (360) [300].
Very profound and intelligent! The laws of logic are reflections of the objective in the subjective consciousness of man.
Vol VI, p. 360 [I, 300-301]:
"The realized concept" is the object.
This transition from the subject, from the concept to the object seems "strange," but by object one must understand not simply being, but the completed "concrete in itself, full, independent"... (361) [301].
"The world is the other-being of the Idea."
Subjectivity (or concept) and object - are the same and are not the same... (362) [302].
Against
itself!
* In the manuscript the word "logic" is connected by an arrow to the word "here" in the text of the following quotation from Hegel. Ed.
166
V. I. LENIN
On the ontological proof of God—nonsense!
... "It is incorrect to regard subjectivity and objectivity as some firm and abstract opposition. Both are fully dialectical"...
(367) [306].
NB
167