The Slogans of the All-Russia Conference of the R.S.D.L.P. in January 1912 and the May Day Movement

Published:Sotsial-DemokratNo. 27, June 17 (4), 1912.

      Published according to the text inSotsial-Demokrat.Source:Lenin
	  Collected Works,

      Progress Publishers,[1975],

      Moscow,Volume 18,

      pages110-115.Translated:Stepan ApresyanTranscription\Markup:R. CymbalaPublic Domain:Lenin Internet Archive

      (2004).You may freely copy, distribute,
	display and perform this work; as well as make derivative and
	commercial works. Please credit “Marxists Internet
	Archive” as your source.•README

Elsewherein this issue, the reader will find the full text
of a leaflet printed and circulated by the St. Petersburg workers before
the May Day action that will from now on be famous. That leaflet is very
much worth dwelling on, for it is a most important document in the history
of the working-class movement in Russia and in the history of our Party.

Theleaflet reflects acertainstate of disorganisation of the
Social-Democratic Party in the capital, for the appeal is signed, not by
the St. Petersburg Committee, but by individual Social-Democratic groups
and even a group of worker Socialist-Revolutionaries. In most parts of
Russia, the state of our Party is such that its directing committees and
centres are constantly being arrested, and constantly re establish
themselves thanks to the existence of all kinds of factory, trade union,
sub-district and district Social-Democratic groups—the very same
“nuclei” that have always roused the hatred of the liberals and
liquidators. In the latest issue of the magazine published by those
gentlemen (Nasha Zarya, 1912, No. 4), the reader can see again and
again how Mr. V. Levitsky, writing with impotent rage andvomitingabuse, hisses against the “rebirth of the Party through an artificial
revival of politically dead nuclei”.

Whatmakes the leaflet under review all the more typical and noteworthy
is the fact that, owing to the arrest of the St. Petersburg Committee, it
was thenucleithat had to appear on the scene, nuclei deprived by
the will of the police of the “directing centre” so hateful to the
liquidators. Owing to this fact, which every revolutionary will find sad,theindependentlife of the nuclei came into the open. The nuclei
had in all haste to rally their forces, establish contacts, and restore the
“underground” in the face of fierce persecution by the police,
who positively raged before May Day. The groups, representatives, etc.,
whose names appear under the leaflet, all constitute that veryundergroundthat is hateful to the liberals and the
liquidators. While the same liquidationist leader, Mr. Levitsky, speaking
on behalf ofNasha ZaryaandZhivoye Dyelo, of course
assailed, foaming at the mouth, the “cult of the underground”
(see p. 33 of the above-mentioned issue), we had, in the shape of the
St. Petersburg leaflet, a precise and complete document revealing to us the
existence of that underground, its vitality, thecontentof its
work, and its significance.

TheSt. Petersburg Committee has been wiped out through the arrests, so
now we shall see just what the underground nuclei are like in themselves,
what they are doing or can do, what ideas they have actually made their own
or evolved in their midst, and not merely borrowed from the supreme Party
body, what ideas really enjoy the workers’ sympathy.

Theleaflet shows what the nuclei are doing: they are carrying on the
work of the St. Petersburg Committee, which for the time being is shattered
(to the delight of all the diverse enemies of the underground). They
continue preparing for May Day. They hastily re-establish the contacts
betweendifferentunderground Social-Democratic groups. They en
list worker Socialist-Revolutionaries too, for they are well aware of the
importance of uniting the proletariat round a living revolutionary
cause. They rally these different Social-Democratic groups, and even a
“group of worker Socialist-Revolutionaries”, roundspecificslogans of the struggle. And this is when the realcharacterof
the movement, the realsentimentof the proletariat, the realstrengthof the R.S.D.L.P. and ofits JanuaryAll-Russia
Conference, stands out.

Asa result of the arrests, there happens to be no hierarchic body able
to decree the advancing of particular slogans. Hence the proletarian
masses, the worker Social-Democrats and even some of the
Socialist-Revolutionaries can be unitedonlyby slogans that are
really indisputable for the masses,only by slogans that derive their strength not from a “decree from above”
(as demagogues and liquidators put it), but from theconvictionof
the revolutionary workers themselves.

Andwhat do we find?

Wefind that,afterthe St. Petersburg Committee had been
shattered, at a time when its immediate restoration was impossible, and
when one group of workers influenced another group solely by ideological,
and not by organisational, means,the slogans adopted were those of the
All-Russia Conference of the R.S.D.L.P. which was convened in
January 1912and which evokes a positively mad, savage hatred on the
part of the liberals, the liquidators, Lieber, Trotsky and Co.!

“Letour slogans be,” the St. Petersburg workers wrote in their
leaflet, “a constituent assembly, an eight-hour working day, the
confiscation of the landed estates.” And further on the leaflet launches
the call: “Down with the tsarist government! Down with the autocratic
Constitution of June 3! Long live the democratic republic! Long live
socialism!”

Wesee from this instructive document thatallthe slogans put
forward by the Conference of the R.S.D.L.P. have been adopted by the
St. Petersburg proletariat and have set their seal on the first steps of
the new Russian revolution. All kinds of slanderers and detractors of the
January Conference may carry on their dirty business as much as they
like. The revolutionary proletariat of St. Petersburg has answered
them. The work started long before the last Conference by revolutionary
Social-Democrats, calling on the proletariat to assume the role of leader
of thepeople’srevolution, has borne fruit despite all
police persecution, despite the reckless pre-May Day arrests and hounding
of revolutionaries, despite the torrent of lies and abuse from the liberal
and liquidationist press.

Hundredsof thousands of St. Petersburg proletarians, followed by
workers throughout Russia, resorted to strikes and street demonstrations
not as one of the separate classes of bourgeois society, not with “their
own” merely economic slogans, but as the leader raising aloft the banner
of the revolutionforthe whole people,on behalf ofthe
whole people, andwith the aim ofawakening and drawing into thestruggleallthe classes who need freedom and are capable of
striving for it.

Therevolutionary movement of the proletariat in Russia has risen to a
higher level. Whereas in 1905 it began with mass strikes and

Gaponiads,[1]in 1912, despite the fact that the police has smashed our
Party organisations, the movement is beginning with mass strikes and theraising of the republican banner! The separate “nuclei” and
disconnected “groups” of workers did their duty under the most difficult
and trying conditions. The proletariat set up its own “May Day
committees” and went into action with arevolutionaryplatform
worthy of the class which is destined to free man kind from wage slavery.

TheMay Day movement also shows what meaning somewordsabout
“unity” have and how the workers unitein reality. Rubanovich, a
spokesman for the Socialist-Revolutionary Party, writes inBudushcheye,[2]Burtsev’s Paris newspaper, that “we must point
out the following note worthy feature of this May Day action: at the
preparatory meetings, St. Petersburg workers refused to recognise the
division existing among the various socialist groups; ...  the prevailing
tendency was towards agreement”. The leaflet we have reprinted clearly
shows whatfactprompted such an inference. The fact is that the
Social-Democratic nuclei, which had lost their guiding centre,
re-established contact with all the various groups by winning over workers
regardless of the views they held andadvocating to them alltheir
Party slogans. And precisely because these Party slogans are correct,
because they are in keeping with the proletariat’s revolutionary tasks and
comprise the tasks of a revolution of the whole people, they were accepted
byallworkers.

Unitymaterialised because the January Conference of the
R.S.D.L.P. gave up the idle game of bringing about agreement among small
groups abroad, gave up the idle wooing of the liquidators of the
revolutionary party, and put forward clear and precise fighting slogansat the right time. The proletariat’s unity for revolutionary
action was achieved not by compromising between the proletarian
(Social-Democratic) and the non-proletarian (Socialist Revolutionary)
parties, not by seeking agreement with the liquidators who have broken away
from the Social-Democratic Party, but by rallying the workers of Russian Social-Democratic
organisations and by these workers making a correct appraisal of the tasks
of the moment.

Agood lesson for those who, succumbing to the idle chatter of the
liberals of the Bund and the Trotskys from Vienna, are still capable of
believing in “unity”—with the liquidators. The vaunted “Organising
Commission” of Lieber, Trotsky and the liquidators cried out from the
house-tops about “unity”, but in fact it could not, and did not, supplya singleslogan actually uniting the revolutionary struggle of the
workers. The liquidators suppliedtheir own, non-revolutionary
slogans, slogans of a liberal labour policy, but the movement disregarded
them. That is what lies at the bottom of the Trotskyist fables about
“unity”!

Swearingand vowing that he was “unifying”, and cursing the
Conference as hard as he could, Trotsky assured good souls in Vienna on
April 23 (May 6) that “the struggle for freedom of association is thebasis” (!!) of the Lena events and of their repercussions, that
“this demand is, and will be, thecentral[!!] issue of the
revolutionary mobilisation of the proletariat”. Scarcely a week had passed
when these pitiful phrases of the yes-man of the liquidators were swept
away like so much dust—by the “representatives of all the organised
workers of St. Petersburg”, “the Social-Democratic Obyedineniye group”,
“the central Social-Democratic city group”, “the group of worker
Socialist-Revolutionaries”, “the group of worker Social-Democrats” and
“the representatives of May Day committees”.

TheSocial-Democratic proletariat of St. Petersburg has realised that a
new revolutionary struggle must be started, not for the sake of one right,
even though it should be the most essential, the most important for the
working class, but for the sake ofthe freedom of the whole
people.

TheSocial-Democratic proletariat of St. Petersburg has realised that
it must generalise its demands, and not break them up into parts, that the
republic includes freedom of association, and not vice versa, that it is
necessary to strike at the centre, to attack the source of evil, to destroy
the whole system, the whole regime, of the Russia of the tsar and the Black
Hundreds.

TheSocial-Democratic proletariat of St. Petersburg has realised that
it is ridiculous and absurd to claim freedom of associationfromNicholas Romanov,fromthe Black-Hundred Duma, that it is
ridiculous and absurd to presume that Russia’s present political system,
our “autocratic Constitution of June 3”, iscompatible withfreedom of association, that in a country where there is a general and
indiscriminate lack of rights, where arbitrary rule and provocation by the
authorities reign supreme, and where there is no “freedom” even for
simply helping tens of millions of starving people—it is only liberal
chatterers and liberal labour politicians that can put freedom of
association as “the central issue of revolutionary mobilisation”.

TheSocial-Democratic proletariat of St. Petersburg has realised that
and unfurled therepublicanbanner, demanding an eight-hour day
and confiscation of the landed estates as the only guarantee of the truly
democratic character of the revolution.

[1]OnJanuary 9, 1905, the tsar ordered his troops to fire on a peaceful
demonstration of St. Petersburg workers who were marching to the Winter
Palace with the priest Gapon at their head to submita petition to the tsar. The atrocious shooting of the defenceless workers
gave rise to mass political strikes and demonstrations all over Russia
under the slogan of “Down with the autocracy!” The events of January 9
were the starting-point of the revolution of 1905–07.

[2]Budushcheye(L’Avenir)—a liberal bourgeois weekly
published in Paris from October 1911 to January 1914 in Russian (some items
were published in French). It was edited by V. L. Burtsev and Mensheviks
and Socialist-Revolutionaries contributed to it.